ENOG.L vs. CDNS
ENOG.L (Energean Oil & Gas plc) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. ENOG.L operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ENOG.L returned 4.39%/yr vs 27.70%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENOG.L is traded in GBp, while CDNS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CDNS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOG.L achieves a -14.24% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 31.01% return.
ENOG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.94%
- YTD
- -14.24%
- 6M
- -16.10%
- 1Y
- -11.30%
- 3Y*
- -4.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CDNS
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- 31.01%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 27.70%
- 10Y*
- 33.41%
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOG.L Energean Oil & Gas plc | -14.24% | -6.22% | 9.22% | -13.64% | 58.32% | 18.55% | -22.45% | 48.02% | 43.78% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 31.01% | -3.38% | 12.24% | 61.08% | -3.55% | 37.88% | 90.92% | 53.45% | 23.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOG.L and CDNS is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ENOG.L:
£1.44B
CDNS:
$111.68B
ENOG.L:
-£1.94
CDNS:
$4.28
ENOG.L:
0.59
CDNS:
20.17
ENOG.L:
10.15
CDNS:
12.80
ENOG.L:
£2.45B
CDNS:
$5.53B
ENOG.L:
£811.30M
CDNS:
$4.91B
ENOG.L:
£1.42B
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOG.L vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
ENOG.L
CDNS
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOG.L | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.22 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.34 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 2.85 | -3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOG.L | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.08 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.50 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOG.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -84.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOG.L and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOG.L | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.41% | -84.59% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.11% | -30.07% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -31.22% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.47% | -31.22% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.58% | -1.76% | -33.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -20.20% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.75% | 14.10% | -4.35% |
Volatility
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) is 8.18%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that ENOG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOG.L | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 12.26% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | 29.97% | -8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.35% | 37.26% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 35.07% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 33.84% | +11.41% |
Dividends
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
ENOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENOG.L Energean Oil & Gas plc | 13.07% | 10.09% | 8.57% | 8.56% | 3.41% |
Financials
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energean Oil & Gas plc and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENOG.L vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
ENOG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energean Oil & Gas plc reported a gross profit of 221.43M and revenue of 928.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
ENOG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energean Oil & Gas plc reported an operating income of 195.15M and revenue of 928.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
ENOG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energean Oil & Gas plc reported a net income of -369.83M and revenue of 928.78M, resulting in a net margin of -39.8%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOG.L and CDNS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENOG.L and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer