MKC vs. VTI
MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) is a stock, while VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Over the past 10 years, MKC returned 2.03%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for VTI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MKC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -21.60% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 2.03%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.
MKC
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- 6M
- -21.15%
- YTD
- -21.60%
- 1Y
- -24.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.10%
- 5Y*
- -7.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
MKC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -21.60% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.83% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKC and VTI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.41 |
The correlation between MKC and VTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
MKC
VTI
MKC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.31 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.51 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 11.00 | -12.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -55.45% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.93% | -8.92% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.65% | -19.30% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.02% | -25.36% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.02% | -35.00% | -17.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.31% | -0.16% | -44.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -8.00% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 2.03% | +16.23% |
Volatility
MKC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.34%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 4.34% | +6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.98% | 10.10% | +14.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.01% | 12.80% | +16.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 17.51% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 18.28% | +6.07% |
Dividends
MKC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than VTI's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.60% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MKC and VTI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKC has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to VTI (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKC dropped -52.02% vs VTI's -55.45%.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MKC and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer