MKAM vs. CTAP
MKAM (MKAM ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MKAM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
MKAM vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKAM achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 7.96% return.
MKAM
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MKAM vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MKAM MKAM ETF | 5.05% | 0.27% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 7.96% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKAM and CTAP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKAM vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MKAM
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MKAM vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MKAM ETF (MKAM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKAM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKAM vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKAM drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKAM and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKAM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -20.48% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -15.43% | +15.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -4.40% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | — | — |
Volatility
MKAM vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKAM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41% | 24.47% | -18.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 24.47% | -18.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 24.47% | -18.19% |
MKAM vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MKAM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
MKAM vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
MKAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than CTAP's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | 2.67% | 2.56% | 1.88% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MKAM and CTAP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for MKAM.
MKAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: MKAM and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for MKAM and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for MKAM and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer