MJUS vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MJUS (ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MJUS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by ETFMG, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. MJUS is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MJUS charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

MJUS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and SENT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.40

The correlation between MJUS and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MJUS vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MJUS	SENT
Healthcare	14.1%	24.8%
Financial Services	4.7%	6.1%
Technology	3.6%	26.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	10.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Communication Services	-	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.1%
Energy	-	10.3%
Industrials	-	14.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MJUS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MJUS	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.25	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MJUS	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-30.34%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.23%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.90%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MJUS	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.66%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.32%	—

MJUS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

MJUS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MJUS nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJUS and SENT in my portfolio?

MJUS and SENT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MJUS or SENT?

On fees, MJUS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJUS or SENT?

MJUS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJUS or SENT?

MJUS and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MJUS and SENT?

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while SENT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJUS and 1.01% for SENT.