MJUS vs. IPAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MJUS (ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MJUS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by ETFMG, while IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index. MJUS is actively managed, while IPAY is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

MJUS vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPAY

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -9.09%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 6M: -16.03%
• 1Y: -23.21%
• 3Y*: 1.92%
• 5Y*: -8.70%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-16.45%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and IPAY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.33

The correlation between MJUS and IPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MJUS vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MJUS	IPAY
Healthcare	14.1%	-
Financial Services	4.7%	41.3%
Technology	3.6%	54.6%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	4.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MJUS vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MJUS	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.21	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MJUS	IPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-51.75%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-31.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-39.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.67%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MJUS	IPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	23.70%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	26.04%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.38%	—

MJUS vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MJUS and IPAY have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

MJUS vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJUS and IPAY in my portfolio?

MJUS and IPAY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MJUS or IPAY?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJUS or IPAY?

MJUS and IPAY have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJUS or IPAY?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for MJUS.

What is the main difference between MJUS and IPAY?

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while IPAY is Technology Equities.