MJUS vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MJUS (ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MJUS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by ETFMG, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. MJUS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

MJUS vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.42%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and DBMF is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	-0.00

MJUS vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MJUS	DBMF
Healthcare	14.1%	12.7%
Financial Services	4.7%	12.5%
Technology	3.6%	29.8%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	11.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.1%
Energy	-	3.9%
Industrials	-	8.4%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

MJUS vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MJUS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.77	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MJUS	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.39%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.59%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MJUS	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.17%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.52%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.41%	—

MJUS vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MJUS vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.09%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJUS and DBMF in my portfolio?

MJUS and DBMF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MJUS or DBMF?

On fees, MJUS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJUS or DBMF?

MJUS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJUS or DBMF?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for MJUS.

What is the main difference between MJUS and DBMF?

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJUS and 0.85% for DBMF.