MJ vs. SPSM
MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - MJ tracks the Prime Alternative Harvest Index while SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MJ returned -35.31%/yr vs 5.71%/yr for SPSM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
MJ vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 15.28% return.
MJ
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -14.07%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 40.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.86%
- 5Y*
- -35.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
MJ vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | -14.07% | 13.07% | -23.97% | -24.18% | -61.55% | -22.79% | -16.18% | -31.36% | -22.57% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between MJ and SPSM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MJ and SPSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MJ vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MJ
SPSM
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
MJ
SPSM
Consumer Defensive
MJ
SPSM
Real Estate
MJ
SPSM
Consumer Cyclical
MJ
SPSM
Technology
MJ
SPSM
Financial Services
MJ
SPSM
Basic Materials
MJ
-
SPSM
Communication Services
MJ
-
SPSM
Energy
MJ
-
SPSM
Industrials
MJ
-
SPSM
Utilities
MJ
-
SPSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MJ vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
MJ
SPSM
MJ vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MJ | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.82 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.64 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.63 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 12.14 | -10.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MJ | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.82 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | 0.27 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.45 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
MJ vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than SPSM's maximum drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MJ | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.55% | -42.89% | -53.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.66% | -8.72% | -39.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.73% | -27.94% | -41.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.27% | -27.94% | -65.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.45% | -0.97% | -93.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -7.93% | -61.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.08% | 2.60% | +24.48% |
Volatility
MJ vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.44%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MJ | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.92% | 4.44% | +7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.46% | 11.64% | +47.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.70% | 17.47% | +69.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 21.43% | +38.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.74% | 22.99% | +32.75% |
MJ vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MJ vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than SPSM's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 2.31% | 1.98% | 13.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MJ and SPSM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MJ has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJ dropped -96.55% vs SPSM's -42.89%.
On 5-year performance, SPSM leads with 5.71% vs -35.31% for MJ. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 5.71% return vs -35.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MJ.
MJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.43% for SPSM.
MJ tracks Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJ and 0.05% for SPSM.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MJ and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer