MISL vs. POW
MISL (First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MISL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. MISL is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MISL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
MISL vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.
MISL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -10.63%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 13.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- 34.18%
- YTD
- 41.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MISL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 2.21% | -2.13% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 41.57% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MISL and POW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MISL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
MISL
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MISL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MISL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MISL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, roughly equal to the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -18.37% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.26% | -16.82% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -4.40% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | — | — |
Volatility
MISL vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MISL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.25% | 32.91% | -8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 32.91% | -13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 32.91% | -13.36% |
MISL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MISL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.74% | 0.63% | 0.08% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MISL and POW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MISL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MISL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
MISL has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for MISL and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer