MINDX vs. FERCX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MINDX (Matthews India Fund) and FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - MINDX is a India Equities fund managed by Matthews, while FERCX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MINDX returned 5.73%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for FERCX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MINDX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for FERCX.

Performance

MINDX vs. FERCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINDX achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly lower than FERCX's 27.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MINDX has underperformed FERCX with an annualized return of 5.73%, while FERCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.

MINDX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: -1.97%
• YTD: -5.07%
• 1Y: -1.12%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: 3.94%
• 10Y*: 5.73%
• ALL TIME*: 9.31%

FERCX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -3.53%
• 6M: 16.76%
• YTD: 27.17%
• 1Y: 44.20%
• 3Y*: 28.46%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: 13.27%
• ALL TIME*: 9.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MINDX Matthews India Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MINDX vs. FERCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINDX Matthews India Fund	-5.07%	1.61%	9.99%	23.14%	-9.87%	17.87%	16.46%	-0.79%	-9.80%	33.76%
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	27.17%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MINDX and FERCX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2005	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between MINDX and FERCX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MINDX vs. FERCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MINDX

MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MINDX vs. FERCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MINDX	FERCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.83	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	2.30	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.33	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	2.96	-3.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	9.43	-9.53

MINDX vs. FERCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FERCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINDX and FERCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MINDX vs. FERCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINDX drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than FERCX's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINDX and FERCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINDX	FERCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.18%	-61.15%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.96%	-15.66%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.51%	-17.64%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.51%	-51.15%	+24.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.46%	-58.44%	+9.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.31%	-9.75%	-3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.96%	-21.12%	+6.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.81%	4.91%	+4.90%

Volatility

MINDX vs. FERCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) is 5.16%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that MINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINDX	FERCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	9.99%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	23.13%	-9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.34%	25.44%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	23.78%	-7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	21.53%	-4.01%

MINDX vs. FERCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINDX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FERCX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINDX vs. FERCX - Dividend Comparison

MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, while FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	7.12%	6.76%	15.03%	3.07%	15.30%	9.87%	3.03%	12.04%	16.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINDX and FERCX in my portfolio?

MINDX and FERCX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MINDX or FERCX?

FERCX has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to MINDX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINDX dropped -72.18% vs FERCX's -61.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.