MINDX vs. WAINX

In the year-to-date period, MINDX achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than WAINX's -2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MINDX has underperformed WAINX with an annualized return of -1.14%, while WAINX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.43% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MINDX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WAINX's 1.51% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MINDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the WAINX Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINDX and WAINX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither MINDX nor WAINX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MINDX drawdown since its inception was -74.48%, which is greater than WAINX's maximum drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINDX and WAINX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) is 6.26%, while Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that MINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.