PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MILN vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MILN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILN achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MILN has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.28%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


MILN

1D
-1.10%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-9.79%
6M
-9.62%
1Y
-10.13%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
11.28%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MILN vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
-9.79%4.63%27.11%36.27%-38.55%13.99%44.77%32.24%2.57%24.48%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MILN and VGT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2016

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between MILN and VGT has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MILN vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MILN
VGT

Consumer Cyclical

51.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

16.2%
0.5%

Technology

14.0%
98.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Financial Services

4.8%
0.5%

Healthcare

0.8%
0.0%

Industrials

0.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

MILN
51.5%
VGT
0.1%

Communication Services

MILN
16.2%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

MILN
14.0%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Defensive

MILN
6.5%
VGT

-

Real Estate

MILN
5.9%
VGT

-

Financial Services

MILN
4.8%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

MILN
0.8%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

MILN
0.4%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

MILN

-

VGT
0.0%

Energy

MILN

-

VGT
0.3%

Utilities

MILN

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MILN vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILN
MILN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MILN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MILN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MILNVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.47

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

3.69

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

11.77

-12.80

MILN vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILN Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILN and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MILNVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

2.95

-3.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.89

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.05

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Drawdowns

MILN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILN drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILN and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MILNVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-54.63%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-16.40%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.48%

-27.23%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-35.07%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-35.07%

-9.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.36%

-1.48%

-14.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-7.95%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.87%

5.13%

+4.74%

Volatility

MILN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is 4.43%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that MILN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MILNVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

6.39%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

16.07%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.06%

20.57%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

25.18%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

24.60%

-2.58%

MILN vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MILN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

MILN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
0.28%0.25%0.22%0.33%0.24%0.15%0.21%0.43%0.43%0.89%0.32%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


MILN and VGT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to MILN (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILN dropped -44.40% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 11.28% for MILN. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MILN has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MILN.

VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.28% for MILN.

MILN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. MILN tracks Indxx Millennials Thematic Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MILN and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MILN and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer