MIGO vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MIGO (MIG Core ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIGO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. MIGO is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

MIGO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MIGO

• 1D: -4.64%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: -5.95%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 22.55%
• 6M: 21.67%
• 1Y: 33.50%
• 3Y*: 31.72%
• 5Y*: 13.56%
• 10Y*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIGO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MIGO MIG Core ETF	15.28%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MIGO and MTUM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

MIGO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 54
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIGO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIGO	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.58	0.81	+1.77

Drawdowns

MIGO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIGO	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.39%	-34.08%	+20.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-6.99%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-6.21%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MIGO	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.17%	20.03%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.17%	20.77%	+4.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.17%	21.12%	+4.05%

MIGO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIGO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MIGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIGO MIG Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.64%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIGO and MTUM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MIGO and MTUM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MIGO or MTUM?

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIGO or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MIGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIGO or MTUM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for MIGO.

What is the main difference between MIGO and MTUM?

MIGO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MIGO and 0.15% for MTUM.