MIDU vs. NIOG
MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MIDU tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO). Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
MIDU vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 39.00% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -30.01% return.
MIDU
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- YTD
- 39.00%
- 1Y
- 47.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
NIOG
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -17.51%
- 6M
- -15.19%
- YTD
- -30.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIDU vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 39.00% | -0.49% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -30.01% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDU and NIOG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDU vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
MIDU
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MIDU vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIDU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIDU vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than NIOG's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.26% | -56.27% | -29.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -56.15% | +50.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -24.97% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | — | — |
Volatility
MIDU vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.37% | 113.41% | -66.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.42% | 113.41% | -53.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.43% | 113.41% | -49.98% |
MIDU vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDU vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.51% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDU and NIOG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.
MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.
MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for MIDU and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer