MIDSX vs. USG
MIDSX (Midas Fund) and USG (USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund) are both mutual funds - MIDSX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Midas, while USG is a Gold fund actively managed by USCF. Over the past 3 years, MIDSX returned 46.08%/yr vs 24.54%/yr for USG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDSX charges 4.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for USG.
Performance
MIDSX vs. USG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than USG's -5.03% return.
MIDSX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -5.72%
- 1Y
- 63.21%
- 3Y*
- 46.08%
- 5Y*
- 20.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
USG
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIDSX vs. USG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | -0.86% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | 0.80% |
USG USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund | -5.03% | 52.02% | 23.70% | 8.49% | 2.12% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDSX and USG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between MIDSX and USG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDSX vs. USG — Risk / Return Rank
MIDSX
USG
MIDSX vs. USG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIDSX | USG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.73 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 2.06 | +2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIDSX vs. USG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than USG's maximum drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and USG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDSX | USG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.77% | -22.96% | -66.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.99% | -22.96% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.99% | -22.96% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.94% | -22.40% | -20.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.48% | -4.51% | -58.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.02% | 8.11% | +4.91% |
Volatility
MIDSX vs. USG - Volatility Comparison
Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a higher volatility of 17.82% compared to USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) at 8.00%. This indicates that MIDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDSX | USG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.82% | 8.00% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.39% | 22.84% | +16.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.22% | 24.33% | +21.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.04% | 16.09% | +18.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 16.09% | +17.52% |
MIDSX vs. USG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDSX vs. USG - Dividend Comparison
MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USG USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund | 29.34% | 27.33% | 7.48% | 8.16% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDSX and USG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDSX has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to USG (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDSX dropped -89.77% vs USG's -22.96%.
MIDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDSX and USG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer