PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USG vs. QGLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USG vs. QGLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) and The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USG achieves a -3.37% return, which is significantly lower than QGLDX's -2.49% return.


USG

1D
-0.69%
1M
-6.85%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
-6.24%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
10Y*

QGLDX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-5.60%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
26.49%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USG vs. QGLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USG
USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
-3.37%52.02%23.70%8.49%2.12%3.50%
QGLDX
The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class
-2.49%59.91%24.52%10.39%-4.64%1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between USG and QGLDX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.82

The correlation between USG and QGLDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USG vs. QGLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USG
USG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
USG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
USG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
USG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
USG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QGLDX
QGLDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QGLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
QGLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USG vs. QGLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) and The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USGQGLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.95

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

2.62

-0.21

USG vs. QGLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the QGLDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USG and QGLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USG vs. QGLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USG drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, smaller than the maximum QGLDX drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USG and QGLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGQGLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.96%

-27.17%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.96%

-24.65%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.96%

-24.65%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.05%

-21.93%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-11.35%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.98%

8.91%

-0.93%

Volatility

USG vs. QGLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) is 7.90%, while The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that USG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGQGLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.90%

8.45%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.78%

24.29%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

27.46%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

18.42%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

16.61%

-0.53%

USG vs. QGLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QGLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

USG vs. QGLDX - Dividend Comparison

USG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.84%, less than QGLDX's 62.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QGLDX
The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class
62.09%60.49%28.70%10.20%0.00%0.00%9.92%14.32%1.23%5.75%2.08%
USG
USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
28.84%27.33%7.48%8.16%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, USG and QGLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QGLDX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to USG (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USG dropped -22.96% vs QGLDX's -27.17%.

QGLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USG and QGLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer