MIDSX vs. FGADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX).
MIDSX is managed by Midas. It was launched on Jan 7, 1986. FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010.
Performance
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 3.72% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | -19.23% | 10.64% | 30.56% | -12.90% | 5.98% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | -2.17% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than FGADX's -2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed FGADX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while FGADX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.
MIDSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -25.21%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 115.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
FGADX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -26.97%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- 105.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDSX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank
MIDSX
FGADX
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDSX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.52 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.76 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.42 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 12.92 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDSX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.52 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.26 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDSX and FGADX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison
MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 10.03% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% |
Drawdowns
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than FGADX's maximum drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and FGADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDSX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.77% | -78.57% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.18% | -31.15% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.48% | -48.77% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.07% | -49.27% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.30% | -27.31% | -12.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -34.82% | -28.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 8.25% | -0.06% |
Volatility
MIDSX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison
Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) have volatilities of 15.85% and 15.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDSX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 15.80% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.12% | 34.37% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.35% | 42.43% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 32.95% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 32.73% | +0.61% |