MIDE vs. RUNN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN).

MIDE and RUNN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. RUNN is an actively managed fund by Running Oak Capital. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023.

Performance

MIDE vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIDE vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	2.61%	9.81%	11.21%	10.45%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-2.84%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -2.84% return.

MIDE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -5.40%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 5.51%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: 0.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF

Return for Risk

MIDE vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE

MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 48
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 12
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIDE	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.02	+0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	0.15	+1.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.02	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	0.04	+1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	0.11	+5.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIDE vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and RUNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIDE	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.02	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.72	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and RUNN is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MIDE vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.46%	1.52%	1.45%	1.36%	1.33%	0.93%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDE	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.59%	-16.83%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.54%	-10.60%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.94%	-7.74%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-3.36%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	3.82%	-0.32%

Volatility

MIDE vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 4.42%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDE	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	4.42%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	9.85%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.24%	16.68%	+4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	13.87%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.80%	13.87%	+5.93%