PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDE vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDE vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MIDE having a 14.45% return and IJH slightly lower at 14.10%.


MIDE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.36%
YTD
14.45%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

IJH

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.84%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.33%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
14.45%9.81%11.21%15.20%-11.63%11.77%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.10%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and IJH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.99

The correlation between MIDE and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDE vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDE
IJH

Industrials

23.3%
25.0%

Financial Services

16.8%
14.4%

Technology

13.9%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

9.9%
8.6%

Real Estate

8.8%
7.5%

Energy

5.7%
5.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.8%

Utilities

1.7%
3.1%

Communication Services

0.9%
1.0%

Industrials

MIDE
23.3%
IJH
25.0%

Financial Services

MIDE
16.8%
IJH
14.4%

Technology

MIDE
13.9%
IJH
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDE
12.1%
IJH
10.7%

Healthcare

MIDE
9.9%
IJH
8.6%

Real Estate

MIDE
8.8%
IJH
7.5%

Energy

MIDE
5.7%
IJH
5.5%

Basic Materials

MIDE
3.7%
IJH
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

MIDE
3.2%
IJH
3.8%

Utilities

MIDE
1.7%
IJH
3.1%

Communication Services

MIDE
0.9%
IJH
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDE vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE
MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDEIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.90

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

10.60

+0.24

MIDE vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDEIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.65

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDEIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-55.07%

+30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.83%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-24.10%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-24.10%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.12%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-7.57%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.41%

+0.21%

Volatility

MIDE vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.37%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDEIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.37%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

11.32%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

15.54%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

19.74%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

21.18%

-1.51%

MIDE vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MIDE vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
1.31%1.52%1.45%1.36%1.33%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MIDE and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDE has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to IJH (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 5-year performance, MIDE leads with 8.31% vs 8.17% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MIDE has performed better with a 8.31% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MIDE.

MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.

MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.05% for IJH.

MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDE and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer