PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDD vs. MNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MIDD vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDD achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's 26.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDD has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 6.02%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.


MIDD

1D
-0.55%
1M
31.54%
6M
33.97%
YTD
40.23%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
6.02%

MNST

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.57%
6M
25.25%
YTD
26.61%
1Y
65.00%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDD vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDD
The Middleby Corporation
40.23%9.76%-7.96%9.91%-31.95%52.62%17.71%6.61%-23.88%4.77%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
26.61%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%42.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDD and MNST is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.22

The correlation between MIDD and MNST shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MIDD:

$6.10B

MNST:

$94.94B

EPS

MIDD:

-$8.53

MNST:

$2.06

PS Ratio

MIDD:

1.81

MNST:

10.89

PB Ratio

MIDD:

2.68

MNST:

10.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

MIDD:

$3.67B

MNST:

$8.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MIDD:

$1.39B

MNST:

$4.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

MIDD:

-$2.33M

MNST:

$2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDD vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDD
MIDD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDD vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDDMNSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.69

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

11.04

-7.67

MIDD vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDD Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDD and MNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDD vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDD drawdown since its inception was -77.27%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDD and MNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDDMNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.27%

-69.17%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.40%

-17.70%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.40%

-26.04%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.38%

-26.62%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

-30.42%

-38.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-0.58%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-20.61%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

5.91%

+5.84%

Volatility

MIDD vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) has a higher volatility of 20.40% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.73%. This indicates that MIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDDMNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.40%

4.73%

+15.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.42%

20.05%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.53%

26.14%

+18.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.10%

24.64%

+10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.39%

26.26%

+11.13%

Dividends

MIDD vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

MIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.98%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Financials

MIDD vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Middleby Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
839.91M
2.35B
(MIDD) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MIDD vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Middleby Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
38.5%
55.0%
Portfolio components
MIDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a gross profit of 323.19M and revenue of 839.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

MIDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported an operating income of 134.89M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

MIDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a net income of -50.07M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in a net margin of -6.0%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MIDD and MNST have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIDD has higher volatility (20.40%) compared to MNST (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDD dropped -77.27% vs MNST's -69.17%.

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDD and MNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer