PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDD vs. CLH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MIDD vs. CLH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDD achieves a 43.76% return, which is significantly higher than CLH's 32.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDD has underperformed CLH with an annualized return of 6.30%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively higher 19.28% annualized return.


MIDD

1D
3.26%
1M
29.51%
6M
43.58%
YTD
43.76%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
6.30%

CLH

1D
2.37%
1M
6.86%
6M
16.32%
YTD
32.45%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
27.60%
10Y*
19.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDD vs. CLH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDD
The Middleby Corporation
43.76%9.76%-7.96%9.91%-31.95%52.62%17.71%6.61%-23.88%4.77%
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
32.45%1.89%31.88%52.92%14.38%31.10%-11.25%73.76%-8.95%-2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDD and CLH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992

0.22

The correlation between MIDD and CLH shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MIDD:

$6.25B

CLH:

$16.41B

EPS

MIDD:

-$8.53

CLH:

$7.41

PS Ratio

MIDD:

1.86

CLH:

2.74

PB Ratio

MIDD:

2.75

CLH:

5.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

MIDD:

$3.67B

CLH:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MIDD:

$1.39B

CLH:

$1.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

MIDD:

-$2.33M

CLH:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDD vs. CLH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDD
MIDD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CLH
CLH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLH Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDD vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDDCLHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.87

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

5.60

-1.38

MIDD vs. CLH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the CLH Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDD and CLH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDD vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDD drawdown since its inception was -77.27%, smaller than the maximum CLH drawdown of -93.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDD and CLH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDDCLHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.27%

-93.48%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.40%

-19.45%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.40%

-30.86%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.38%

-30.86%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

-64.51%

-4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.00%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-32.82%

+8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

6.49%

+5.26%

Volatility

MIDD vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison

The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) has a higher volatility of 20.49% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) at 5.73%. This indicates that MIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDDCLHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.49%

5.73%

+14.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.52%

19.07%

+12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.45%

27.44%

+17.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.11%

28.58%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.39%

34.72%

+2.67%

Dividends

MIDD vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison

MIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.34%, while CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
0.00%
MIDD
The Middleby Corporation
25.34%

Financials

MIDD vs. CLH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Middleby Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
839.91M
1.46B
(MIDD) Total Revenue
(CLH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MIDD vs. CLH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Middleby Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
38.5%
30.5%
Portfolio components
MIDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a gross profit of 323.19M and revenue of 839.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

CLH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.42M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

MIDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported an operating income of 134.89M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

CLH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.94M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

MIDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a net income of -50.07M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in a net margin of -6.0%.

CLH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a net income of 63.20M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MIDD and CLH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIDD has higher volatility (20.49%) compared to CLH (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDD dropped -77.27% vs CLH's -93.48%.

CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDD and CLH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer