PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHO vs. AAPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHO vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHO achieves a 24.13% return, which is significantly higher than AAPB's 9.55% return.


MHO

1D
6.85%
1M
22.35%
YTD
24.13%
6M
23.32%
1Y
41.71%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
21.95%
10Y*
24.40%

AAPB

1D
-1.28%
1M
-11.03%
YTD
9.55%
6M
7.73%
1Y
90.29%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHO vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MHO
M/I Homes, Inc.
24.13%-3.76%-3.48%198.27%0.41%
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
9.55%-0.93%47.02%77.21%-38.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MHO and AAPB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHO vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHO
MHO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHO vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MHOAAPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.23

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

7.60

-4.58

MHO vs. AAPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the AAPB Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHO and AAPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MHO vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHO drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than AAPB's maximum drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHO and AAPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHOAAPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-58.13%

-33.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.14%

-28.11%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.60%

-58.13%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.20%

-14.37%

+5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-19.23%

-21.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.88%

11.92%

+1.96%

Volatility

MHO vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) is 11.16%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that MHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHOAAPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

14.03%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.99%

33.48%

-9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.17%

45.37%

-10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.96%

51.25%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.10%

51.25%

-5.15%

Dividends

MHO vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison

MHO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
4.01%4.39%0.00%18.75%
MHO
M/I Homes, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHO and AAPB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPB has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to MHO (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHO dropped -91.51% vs AAPB's -58.13%.

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHO and AAPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer