MHO vs. BZH
MHO (M/I Homes, Inc.) and BZH (Beazer Homes USA, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Residential Construction industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, MHO returned 23.61%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for BZH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MHO vs. BZH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MHO achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly lower than BZH's 30.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MHO has outperformed BZH with an annualized return of 23.61%, while BZH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.52% annualized return.
MHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 40.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
BZH
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 30.64%
- 6M
- 30.00%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
MHO vs. BZH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHO M/I Homes, Inc. | 16.52% | -3.76% | -3.48% | 198.27% | -25.73% | 40.39% | 12.55% | 87.20% | -38.90% | 36.62% |
BZH Beazer Homes USA, Inc. | 30.64% | -26.18% | -18.73% | 164.81% | -45.05% | 53.27% | 7.22% | 49.05% | -50.65% | 44.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHO and BZH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1994 | 0.60 |
The correlation between MHO and BZH shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MHO:
$3.96B
BZH:
$741.18M
MHO:
$13.25
BZH:
$1.02
MHO:
11.25
BZH:
25.83
MHO:
0.93
BZH:
0.36
MHO:
0.83
BZH:
0.63
MHO:
$4.36B
BZH:
$2.11B
MHO:
$969.67M
BZH:
$275.68M
MHO:
$559.63M
BZH:
$1.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHO vs. BZH — Risk / Return Rank
MHO
BZH
MHO vs. BZH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) and Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHO | BZH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 0.65 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 1.49 | +1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHO vs. BZH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHO drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, smaller than the maximum BZH drawdown of -99.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHO and BZH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHO | BZH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -99.69% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.14% | -34.98% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.60% | -49.79% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.48% | -59.04% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.57% | -78.92% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.77% | -92.40% | +77.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -63.51% | +22.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.87% | 15.15% | -1.28% |
Volatility
MHO vs. BZH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) is 9.39%, while Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that MHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHO | BZH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 10.18% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.48% | 46.29% | -22.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.78% | 57.62% | -22.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.85% | 53.61% | -14.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.07% | 54.96% | -8.89% |
Dividends
MHO vs. BZH - Dividend Comparison
Neither MHO nor BZH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MHO vs. BZH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M/I Homes, Inc. and Beazer Homes USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MHO vs. BZH - Profitability Comparison
MHO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M/I Homes, Inc. reported a gross profit of 202.59M and revenue of 920.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
BZH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.70M and revenue of 409.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
MHO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M/I Homes, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.07M and revenue of 920.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
BZH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -18.97M and revenue of 409.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
MHO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M/I Homes, Inc. reported a net income of 67.83M and revenue of 920.71M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
BZH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported a net income of 32.56M and revenue of 409.85M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MHO and BZH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BZH has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to MHO (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHO dropped -91.51% vs BZH's -99.69%.
MHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MHO and BZH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer