MGK vs. PRN
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 18.85%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for PRN. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.
Performance
MGK vs. PRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 40.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGK having a 18.85% annualized return and PRN not far behind at 18.49%.
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PRN
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 40.09%
- 6M
- 38.91%
- 1Y
- 62.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.70%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
MGK vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 40.09% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and PRN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MGK and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGK vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
PRN
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
PRN
Communication Services
MGK
PRN
-
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
PRN
Healthcare
MGK
PRN
-
Financial Services
MGK
PRN
Real Estate
MGK
PRN
-
Utilities
MGK
PRN
-
Industrials
MGK
PRN
Basic Materials
MGK
PRN
Consumer Defensive
MGK
PRN
-
Energy
MGK
-
PRN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
PRN
MGK vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 4.33 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 14.20 | -9.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and PRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -59.88% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -14.15% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -30.78% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -34.84% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -36.27% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -1.81% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -10.83% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 4.30% | +0.67% |
Volatility
MGK vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 5.96%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 12.21% | -6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 24.73% | -11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 30.02% | -13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 25.33% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 24.33% | -2.40% |
MGK vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than PRN's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and PRN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs PRN's -59.88%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 18.49% for PRN. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PRN is Momentum. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.60% for PRN.
PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and PRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer