PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 40.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGK having a 18.85% annualized return and PRN not far behind at 18.49%.


MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%

PRN

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
40.09%
6M
38.91%
1Y
62.65%
3Y*
34.70%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
40.09%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and PRN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.76

The correlation between MGK and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGK vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
PRN

Technology

56.1%
18.6%

Communication Services

17.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
1.2%

Healthcare

4.5%

-

Financial Services

4.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Industrials

1.1%
80.0%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Technology

MGK
56.1%
PRN
18.6%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
PRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
PRN
1.2%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
PRN

-

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
PRN
0.2%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
PRN

-

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
PRN

-

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
PRN
80.0%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
PRN
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
PRN

-

Energy

MGK

-

PRN
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

4.33

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

14.20

-9.55

MGK vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-59.88%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-14.15%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-30.78%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-34.84%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-36.27%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-1.81%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-10.83%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

4.30%

+0.67%

Volatility

MGK vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 5.96%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

12.21%

-6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

24.73%

-11.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

30.02%

-13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

25.33%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

24.33%

-2.40%

MGK vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGK vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than PRN's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.12%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and PRN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 18.49% for PRN. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PRN is Momentum. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer