PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. PLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. PLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PLFMX's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed PLFMX with an annualized return of 18.85%, while PLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.77% annualized return.


MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%

PLFMX

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
8.29%
6M
8.63%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. PLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
8.29%17.10%26.06%25.27%-18.67%27.57%17.46%30.58%-5.14%20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and PLFMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.93

The correlation between MGK and PLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. PLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PLFMX
PLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. PLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKPLFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.62

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

11.86

-7.21

MGK vs. PLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the PLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and PLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. PLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum PLFMX drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and PLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKPLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-55.62%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-9.00%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-18.83%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-24.91%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-33.80%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-2.79%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-9.99%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

1.99%

+2.98%

Volatility

MGK vs. PLFMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) at 4.44%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKPLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

4.44%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

9.72%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

12.37%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

16.99%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

17.52%

+4.41%

MGK vs. PLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLFMX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGK vs. PLFMX - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PLFMX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
2.22%2.41%3.77%3.62%2.28%13.02%7.02%3.28%6.80%6.44%2.66%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MGK and PLFMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to PLFMX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs PLFMX's -55.62%.

PLFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and PLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer