MGK vs. PLFMX
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and PLFMX (Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund) are both funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PLFMX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 18.85%/yr vs 14.77%/yr for PLFMX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PLFMX.
Performance
MGK vs. PLFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PLFMX's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed PLFMX with an annualized return of 18.85%, while PLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.77% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PLFMX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
MGK vs. PLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 8.29% | 17.10% | 26.06% | 25.27% | -18.67% | 27.57% | 17.46% | 30.58% | -5.14% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and PLFMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MGK and PLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. PLFMX — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
PLFMX
MGK vs. PLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.62 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 11.86 | -7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. PLFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum PLFMX drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and PLFMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -55.62% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -9.00% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -18.83% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -24.91% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -33.80% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -2.79% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -9.99% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 1.99% | +2.98% |
Volatility
MGK vs. PLFMX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) at 4.44%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 4.44% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 9.72% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 12.37% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 16.99% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 17.52% | +4.41% |
MGK vs. PLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLFMX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. PLFMX - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PLFMX's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.22% | 2.41% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.28% | 13.02% | 7.02% | 3.28% | 6.80% | 6.44% | 2.66% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MGK and PLFMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to PLFMX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs PLFMX's -55.62%.
PLFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and PLFMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer