MGK vs. IGM
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 19.24%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGM.
Performance
MGK vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 19.24%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
MGK vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and IGM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MGK and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGK vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
IGM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
IGM
Communication Services
MGK
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
IGM
Healthcare
MGK
IGM
-
Financial Services
MGK
IGM
Real Estate
MGK
IGM
-
Utilities
MGK
IGM
-
Industrials
MGK
IGM
Basic Materials
MGK
IGM
-
Consumer Defensive
MGK
IGM
-
Energy
MGK
-
IGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
IGM
MGK vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 3.07 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.78 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.81 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 13.36 | -7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 3.07 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.86 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 1.03 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.48 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MGK vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -65.59% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -16.44% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -26.39% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -40.68% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -40.68% | +4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.84% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -15.23% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 4.67% | +0.22% |
Volatility
MGK vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 4.01%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 6.10% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 16.08% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 20.43% | -4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 25.68% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 24.54% | -2.66% |
MGK vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than IGM's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MGK and IGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 19.24% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.46% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer