PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.


MGK

1D
2.22%
1M
1.43%
6M
8.75%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
18.41%
ALL TIME*
13.49%

BITI

1D
-1.48%
1M
-4.03%
6M
13.09%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
56.28%
3Y*
-32.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.18M$25.87M$38.72M
$120.45M$120.74M$143.14M

MGK vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
7.10%20.67%32.94%51.67%-2.61%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
25.22%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and BITI is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.37

The correlation between MGK and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGK vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.24

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

5.45

-1.91

MGK vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-92.16%

+43.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-25.28%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-84.63%

+61.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-86.33%

+82.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-68.61%

+61.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

10.37%

-4.97%

Volatility

MGK vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 6.24%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

8.93%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

33.35%

-18.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

44.25%

-25.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

52.01%

-29.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

52.01%

-29.98%

MGK vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGK vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
21.80%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to MGK (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, MGK leads with 23.88% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MGK has performed better with a 23.88% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer