PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGHYX vs. GF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGHYX vs. GF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and The New Germany Fund (GF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHYX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than GF's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHYX has underperformed GF with an annualized return of 5.06%, while GF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.12% annualized return.


MGHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.43%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
5.06%

GF

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.55%
YTD
3.72%
6M
4.82%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
-3.06%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGHYX vs. GF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
1.59%9.82%6.99%11.17%-11.67%3.22%6.83%16.36%-1.85%6.49%
GF
The New Germany Fund
3.72%48.34%-9.96%11.66%-42.21%7.92%38.43%38.75%-21.55%54.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHYX and GF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1998

0.36

The correlation between MGHYX and GF shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGHYX vs. GF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGHYX
MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GF
GF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGHYX vs. GF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and The New Germany Fund (GF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGHYXGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.07

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

0.32

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

0.77

+11.04

MGHYX vs. GF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the GF Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHYX and GF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGHYX vs. GF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum GF drawdown of -85.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHYX and GF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGHYXGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.47%

-85.97%

+32.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-18.07%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.33%

-20.75%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.93%

-53.83%

+37.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

-53.83%

+31.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-17.65%

+17.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.08%

-33.91%

+9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

7.48%

-6.85%

Volatility

MGHYX vs. GF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) is 0.80%, while The New Germany Fund (GF) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that MGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGHYXGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

4.83%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

16.14%

-13.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

19.77%

-16.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

20.62%

-15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

20.61%

-14.73%

MGHYX vs. GF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GF's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGHYX vs. GF - Dividend Comparison

MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than GF's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GF
The New Germany Fund
2.43%1.30%0.92%0.80%9.74%39.51%12.92%3.29%31.23%3.82%9.05%8.37%
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
5.69%7.17%5.58%4.35%5.81%4.20%5.81%5.63%6.96%3.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGHYX and GF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GF has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to MGHYX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHYX dropped -53.47% vs GF's -85.97%.

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGHYX and GF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer