PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
MGHYX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

MGHYX vs. FFRHX

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX).

MGHYX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Mar 16, 1998. FFRHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MGHYX or FFRHX.

Correlation

The correlation between MGHYX and FFRHX is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

MGHYX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFRHX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MGHYX vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MGHYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGHYX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGHYX is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGHYX is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGHYX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGHYX is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGHYX is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, while FFRHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund		8.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

MGHYX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...