GF vs. CIGIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GF (The New Germany Fund) and CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GF returned 8.02%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for CIGIX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GF charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CIGIX.

Performance

GF vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New Germany Fund (GF) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GF achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 16.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GF has underperformed CIGIX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while CIGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.

GF

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -3.20%
• 6M: -4.96%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 1Y: 0.16%
• 3Y*: 8.42%
• 5Y*: -3.94%
• 10Y*: 8.02%
• ALL TIME*: 3.88%

CIGIX

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: -8.13%
• 6M: 4.57%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 1Y: 26.07%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 1.91%
• 10Y*: 8.71%
• ALL TIME*: 7.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GF The New Germany Fund	$342.45K	$308.40K	$485.94K

GF vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GF The New Germany Fund	-0.63%	48.34%	-9.96%	11.66%	-42.21%	7.92%	38.43%	38.75%	-21.55%	54.50%
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	16.59%	23.11%	12.51%	15.33%	-30.54%	-8.98%	44.95%	29.69%	-20.93%	39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GF and CIGIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2005	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between GF and CIGIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GF vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GF

GF Risk / Return Rank: 3
GF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CIGIX

CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 29
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GF vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New Germany Fund (GF) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GF	CIGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.90	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	1.37	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.18	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	1.33	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.37	4.24	-4.61

GF vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GF Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GF and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GF vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GF drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, which is greater than CIGIX's maximum drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GF and CIGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GF	CIGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.97%	-64.46%	-21.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.07%	-18.45%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.07%	-19.38%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.83%	-50.15%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.83%	-50.15%	-3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.10%	-15.71%	-5.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.87%	-15.24%	-18.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	5.79%	+0.73%

Volatility

GF vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The New Germany Fund (GF) is 5.23%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that GF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GF	CIGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	9.03%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.42%	24.74%	-8.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.03%	27.37%	-7.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.67%	22.10%	-1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	20.40%	+0.18%

GF vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GF vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

GF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CIGIX's 11.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	11.57%	13.49%	4.54%	0.28%	0.00%	0.33%	5.42%	0.00%	13.25%	3.76%	0.00%	0.13%
GF The New Germany Fund	2.53%	1.30%	0.92%	0.80%	9.74%	39.51%	12.92%	3.29%	31.23%	3.82%	9.05%	8.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GF and CIGIX in my portfolio?

GF and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GF or CIGIX?

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to GF (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GF dropped -85.97% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.