PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GF vs. SCPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GF vs. SCPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New Germany Fund (GF) and DWS S&P 500 Index Fund (SCPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GF achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCPIX's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GF has underperformed SCPIX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while SCPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.92% annualized return.


GF

1D
-1.06%
1M
-3.20%
6M
-4.96%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
0.16%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
-3.94%
10Y*
8.02%
ALL TIME*
3.88%

SCPIX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.58%
6M
6.91%
YTD
8.90%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.92%
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$342.45K$308.40K$485.94K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GF vs. SCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GF
The New Germany Fund
-0.63%48.34%-9.96%11.66%-42.21%7.92%38.43%38.75%-21.55%54.50%
SCPIX
DWS S&P 500 Index Fund
8.90%17.21%24.65%25.97%-18.46%27.85%18.21%34.99%-4.58%21.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GF and SCPIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.59

The correlation between GF and SCPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GF vs. SCPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GF
GF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GF Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SCPIX
SCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GF vs. SCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New Germany Fund (GF) and DWS S&P 500 Index Fund (SCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFSCPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.25

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

1.94

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.37

8.33

-8.70

GF vs. SCPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GF Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the SCPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GF and SCPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GF vs. SCPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GF drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, which is greater than SCPIX's maximum drawdown of -55.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GF and SCPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFSCPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.97%

-55.46%

-30.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.07%

-9.17%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-18.99%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.83%

-24.66%

-29.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.83%

-33.85%

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.10%

-2.16%

-18.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-10.58%

-23.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

2.13%

+4.39%

Volatility

GF vs. SCPIX - Volatility Comparison

The New Germany Fund (GF) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to DWS S&P 500 Index Fund (SCPIX) at 3.43%. This indicates that GF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFSCPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.43%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

10.01%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

12.87%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

16.96%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.12%

+2.46%

GF vs. SCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SCPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GF vs. SCPIX - Dividend Comparison

GF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than SCPIX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GF
The New Germany Fund
2.53%1.30%0.92%0.80%9.74%39.51%12.92%3.29%31.23%3.82%9.05%8.37%
SCPIX
DWS S&P 500 Index Fund
4.89%4.09%5.65%7.18%5.57%5.28%6.91%7.88%8.14%6.05%4.83%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


GF and SCPIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GF has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to SCPIX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GF dropped -85.97% vs SCPIX's -55.46%.

SCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GF and SCPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer