MGHYX vs. NHS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MGHYX (DWS Global High Income Fund) and NHS (Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MGHYX returned 4.96%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for NHS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGHYX charges 0.60%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for NHS.

Performance

MGHYX vs. NHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHYX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than NHS's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHYX has underperformed NHS with an annualized return of 4.96%, while NHS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.39% annualized return.

MGHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 3.57%
• 10Y*: 4.96%

NHS

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -10.36%
• 6M: -6.33%
• 1Y: -5.21%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: -1.83%
• 10Y*: 5.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGHYX vs. NHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	1.59%	9.82%	6.99%	11.17%	-11.67%	3.22%	6.83%	16.36%	-1.85%	6.49%
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund	-10.36%	14.81%	11.04%	6.12%	-22.99%	15.78%	4.57%	39.03%	-11.45%	8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHYX and NHS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2003	0.37

Return for Risk

MGHYX vs. NHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGHYX

MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

NHS

NHS Risk / Return Rank: 1
NHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGHYX vs. NHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGHYX	NHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	-0.40	+2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	-0.48	+4.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	0.94	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	-0.31	+3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.81	-0.70	+12.51

MGHYX vs. NHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the NHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHYX and NHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGHYX vs. NHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum NHS drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHYX and NHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGHYX	NHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.47%	-64.67%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.69%	-17.01%	+14.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.33%	-17.01%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.93%	-37.43%	+21.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.84%	-42.97%	+21.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-15.77%	+15.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.08%	-8.87%	-15.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	7.49%	-6.86%

Volatility

MGHYX vs. NHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) is 0.84%, while Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that MGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGHYX	NHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	3.11%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.34%	10.10%	-7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13%	12.97%	-9.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	16.17%	-11.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.88%	16.71%	-10.83%

MGHYX vs. NHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NHS's 4.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGHYX vs. NHS - Dividend Comparison

MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than NHS's 17.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	5.69%	7.17%	5.58%	4.35%	5.81%	4.20%	5.81%	5.63%	6.96%	3.76%	0.00%	0.00%
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund	17.65%	14.60%	14.50%	13.94%	12.75%	8.74%	9.29%	7.99%	8.37%	7.59%	8.23%	9.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGHYX and NHS in my portfolio?

MGHYX and NHS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGHYX or NHS?

NHS has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to MGHYX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHYX dropped -53.47% vs NHS's -64.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.