MGFAX vs. MBCSX
Compare and contrast key facts about MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX).
MGFAX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004. MBCSX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on May 31, 2001.
Performance
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | -13.50% | 14.37% | 15.01% | 33.87% | -32.08% | 19.60% | 27.18% | 30.67% | -14.19% | 35.30% |
MBCSX MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund | -14.78% | 16.68% | 35.05% | 51.00% | -34.11% | 17.05% | 33.53% | 38.41% | 0.22% | 34.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGFAX achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly higher than MBCSX's -14.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFAX has underperformed MBCSX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while MBCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.
MGFAX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.60%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
MBCSX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -14.78%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGFAX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than MBCSX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGFAX vs. MBCSX — Risk / Return Rank
MGFAX
MBCSX
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGFAX | MBCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.42 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.37 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 1.29 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGFAX | MBCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.42 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.31 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGFAX and MBCSX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Dividend Comparison
MGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.47%, which matches MBCSX's 50.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | 50.47% | 43.66% | 16.85% | 30.43% | 28.11% | 15.89% | 5.05% | 0.36% | 27.78% | 12.10% | 3.75% | 8.25% |
MBCSX MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund | 50.80% | 43.29% | 13.12% | 23.06% | 18.44% | 21.93% | 4.59% | 11.06% | 6.70% | 4.00% | 4.77% | 18.85% |
Drawdowns
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGFAX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than MBCSX's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFAX and MBCSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGFAX | MBCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.06% | -54.66% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -17.47% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.09% | -48.37% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.09% | -48.37% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.38% | -17.47% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -12.08% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 5.01% | -0.74% |
Volatility
MGFAX vs. MBCSX - Volatility Comparison
MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) at 5.41%. This indicates that MGFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGFAX | MBCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 5.41% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 12.06% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 22.49% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 29.76% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 25.53% | +1.98% |