PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCSX vs. MEFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBCSX achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than MEFAX's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MBCSX has outperformed MEFAX with an annualized return of 17.30%, while MEFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.


MBCSX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.89%
YTD
4.17%
6M
4.48%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
17.30%

MEFAX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.74%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.17%16.68%35.05%51.00%-34.11%17.05%33.53%38.41%0.22%34.43%
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
5.32%3.19%10.80%19.11%-24.58%13.75%25.52%40.75%-3.88%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MBCSX and MEFAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between MBCSX and MEFAX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCSX vs. MEFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCSX
MBCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MBCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MBCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MEFAX
MEFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MEFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MEFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBCSXMEFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.86

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.33

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.67

4.45

-0.78

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the MEFAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBCSX and MEFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCSXMEFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.86

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.11

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.43

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCSX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MEFAX drawdown of -56.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCSX and MEFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCSXMEFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-56.04%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-10.45%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-34.46%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-45.14%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-45.14%

-3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.19%

+14.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-11.43%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

2.85%

+2.52%

Volatility

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) is 3.47%, while MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that MBCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCSXMEFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.87%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

11.27%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

14.66%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.81%

27.46%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

23.94%

+1.65%

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MEFAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCSX vs. MEFAX - Dividend Comparison

MBCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.56%, more than MEFAX's 32.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
41.56%43.29%13.12%23.06%18.44%21.93%4.59%11.06%6.70%4.00%4.77%18.85%
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
32.43%34.16%21.40%7.62%20.71%29.49%6.92%12.81%12.06%7.66%5.32%10.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBCSX and MEFAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEFAX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to MBCSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBCSX dropped -54.66% vs MEFAX's -56.04%.

MBCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCSX and MEFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer