PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGFAX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGFAX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than MDVAX's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFAX has outperformed MDVAX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while MDVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


MGFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.23%
6M
8.48%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
12.95%

MDVAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.94%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
9.23%14.37%15.01%33.87%-32.08%19.60%27.18%30.67%-14.19%35.30%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.47%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MGFAX and MDVAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004

-0.05

The correlation between MGFAX and MDVAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGFAX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGFAX
MGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGFAXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.48

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.41

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

14.38

-9.52

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGFAX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGFAX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than MDVAX's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFAX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGFAXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-23.02%

-39.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-2.21%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.61%

-5.44%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.09%

-23.02%

-23.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

-23.02%

-23.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-3.49%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-3.47%

-10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

0.52%

+3.91%

Volatility

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.74%. This indicates that MGFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGFAXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

0.74%

+7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

2.15%

+12.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

3.19%

+14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.63%

6.46%

+27.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

5.27%

+22.38%

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGFAX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGFAX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

MGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.97%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
39.97%43.66%16.85%30.43%28.11%15.89%5.05%0.36%27.78%12.10%3.75%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGFAX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGFAX has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to MDVAX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGFAX dropped -62.06% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGFAX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer