PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGFAX vs. MMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGFAX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than MMGEX's 28.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFAX has underperformed MMGEX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while MMGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


MGFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.23%
6M
8.48%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
12.95%

MMGEX

1D
1.39%
1M
7.23%
YTD
28.07%
6M
24.87%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
9.23%14.37%15.01%33.87%-32.08%19.60%27.18%30.67%-14.19%35.30%
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
28.07%10.66%14.79%16.35%-26.21%8.52%40.08%61.40%-5.46%24.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MGFAX and MMGEX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004

0.82

The correlation between MGFAX and MMGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGFAX vs. MMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGFAX
MGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGEX
MMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGFAXMMGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

4.53

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

18.33

-13.47

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the MMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGFAX and MMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGFAX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, roughly equal to the maximum MMGEX drawdown of -63.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFAX and MMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGFAXMMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-63.65%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-10.47%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.61%

-27.79%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.09%

-51.21%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

-51.21%

+5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-23.39%

+9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.58%

+1.85%

Volatility

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) at 7.05%. This indicates that MGFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGFAXMMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

7.05%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

16.15%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

20.61%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.63%

32.53%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

29.06%

-1.41%

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGFAX and MMGEX have an expense ratio of 1.41%.


Dividends

MGFAX vs. MMGEX - Dividend Comparison

MGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.97%, more than MMGEX's 29.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
39.97%43.66%16.85%30.43%28.11%15.89%5.05%0.36%27.78%12.10%3.75%8.25%
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
29.62%37.94%8.94%0.00%0.00%44.40%10.36%32.83%29.40%6.91%0.00%33.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGFAX and MMGEX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGFAX has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to MMGEX (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGFAX dropped -62.06% vs MMGEX's -63.65%.

MMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGFAX and MMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer