PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGFAX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
-13.50%14.37%15.01%33.87%-32.08%19.60%27.18%30.67%-14.19%23.64%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
6.61%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGFAX achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 6.61% return.


MGFAX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-10.80%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-10.60%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
9.83%

GCCHX

1D
-1.04%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
6.61%
6M
15.46%
1Y
64.36%
3Y*
-1.00%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGFAX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MGFAX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGFAX
MGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGFAXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

2.24

-2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.47

2.89

-2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.92

-3.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.49

13.98

-13.49

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGFAX and GCCHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGFAXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

2.24

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.03

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.36

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between MGFAX and GCCHX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

MGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.47%, more than GCCHX's 1.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
50.47%43.66%16.85%30.43%28.11%15.89%5.05%0.36%27.78%12.10%3.75%8.25%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.41%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGFAX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than GCCHX's maximum drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFAX and GCCHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MGFAXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-54.32%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-14.89%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.09%

-54.32%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.38%

-13.15%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-14.11%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

4.18%

+0.09%

Volatility

MGFAX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) is 5.70%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that MGFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MGFAXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

8.34%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

17.07%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

27.75%

-8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.39%

26.87%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.51%

25.21%

+2.30%