MGC vs. EAASX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and EAASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) are both funds - MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while EAASX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.33%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for EAASX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for EAASX.

Performance

MGC vs. EAASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than EAASX's -4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed EAASX with an annualized return of 16.33%, while EAASX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.

MGC

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.65%
• 10Y*: 16.33%

EAASX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 6M: -5.34%
• 1Y: -6.71%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. EAASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	7.43%	19.31%	27.16%	29.77%	-19.95%	27.58%	21.57%	31.14%	-3.45%	22.61%
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A	-4.06%	-5.90%	17.89%	13.72%	-8.98%	21.66%	11.03%	34.03%	-5.79%	24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and EAASX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between MGC and EAASX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MGC vs. EAASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC

MGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

EAASX

EAASX Risk / Return Rank: 1
EAASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EAASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EAASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EAASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EAASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. EAASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGC	EAASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	-0.35	+2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	-0.42	+2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.96	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	-0.37	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.77	-0.69	+11.46

MGC vs. EAASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the EAASX Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and EAASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGC vs. EAASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than EAASX's maximum drawdown of -39.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and EAASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGC	EAASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.26%	-39.96%	-12.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	-14.82%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.28%	-19.45%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-19.95%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.07%	-39.96%	+6.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.81%	-14.94%	+11.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-4.53%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	7.91%	-5.63%

Volatility

MGC vs. EAASX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX) at 4.28%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGC	EAASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	4.28%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	11.49%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.08%	15.58%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.17%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.24%	18.90%	-0.66%

MGC vs. EAASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EAASX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGC vs. EAASX - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than EAASX's 8.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A	8.07%	7.75%	8.22%	3.08%	12.28%	12.19%	11.17%	7.09%	8.01%	3.64%	3.93%	7.29%
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	0.90%	0.93%	1.15%	1.35%	1.65%	1.17%	1.45%	1.81%	2.10%	1.83%	2.14%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGC and EAASX in my portfolio?

MGC and EAASX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGC or EAASX?

MGC has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to EAASX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs EAASX's -39.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.