MGC vs. DMAY
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MGC tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGC returned 14.70%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
MGC vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.73% return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
MGC vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.80% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 29.43% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.73% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and DMAY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MGC and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGC vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
DMAY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MGC
DMAY
Communication Services
MGC
DMAY
Financial Services
MGC
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
DMAY
Healthcare
MGC
DMAY
Industrials
MGC
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
MGC
DMAY
Energy
MGC
DMAY
Basic Materials
MGC
DMAY
Utilities
MGC
DMAY
Real Estate
MGC
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
DMAY
MGC vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.79 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 4.20 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.63 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 4.06 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 24.92 | -11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.79 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
MGC vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -13.90% | -38.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -3.36% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -12.38% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -13.90% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -2.24% | -4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.55% | +1.64% |
Volatility
MGC vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.76%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 0.76% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 3.73% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 4.71% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 9.02% | +8.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 8.43% | +9.78% |
MGC vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGC vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGC and DMAY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, MGC leads with 14.70% vs 7.26% for DMAY. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MGC has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer