PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.73% return.


MGC

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.59%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.75%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.36%

DMAY

1D
0.08%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.76%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
10.80%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%29.43%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.73%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and DMAY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.90

The correlation between MGC and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGC vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
DMAY

Technology

39.3%
36.2%

Communication Services

13.1%
10.9%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.4%

Industrials

6.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

2.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Utilities

1.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Technology

MGC
39.3%
DMAY
36.2%

Communication Services

MGC
13.1%
DMAY
10.9%

Financial Services

MGC
11.7%
DMAY
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
10.1%
DMAY
10.1%

Healthcare

MGC
8.9%
DMAY
8.4%

Industrials

MGC
6.5%
DMAY
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.8%
DMAY
4.9%

Energy

MGC
2.6%
DMAY
3.5%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.2%
DMAY
1.8%

Utilities

MGC
1.0%
DMAY
2.3%

Real Estate

MGC
1.0%
DMAY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGCDMAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.79

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

4.20

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.63

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

4.06

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.61

24.92

-11.31

MGC vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGCDMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.79

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.81

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.88

-0.28

Drawdowns

MGC vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-13.90%

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-3.36%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-12.38%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-13.90%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-2.24%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

0.55%

+1.64%

Volatility

MGC vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.76%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

0.76%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

3.73%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

4.71%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

9.02%

+8.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

8.43%

+9.78%

MGC vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGC vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.87%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGC and DMAY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

On 5-year performance, MGC leads with 14.70% vs 7.26% for DMAY. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGC has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.85% for DMAY.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer