MGA vs. FRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Magna International Inc. (MGA) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT).

Performance

MGA vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Magna International Inc. (MGA) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MGA vs. FRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGA Magna International Inc.	5.52%	33.72%	-26.29%	8.76%	-28.04%	16.57%	33.41%	24.30%	-18.40%	33.69%
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust	6.56%	-5.91%	12.07%	6.55%	-22.66%	65.97%	-30.66%	12.51%	-8.10%	-3.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MGA : $15.69B FRT : $9.13B
EPS MGA : $2.94 FRT : $4.77
PE Ratio MGA : 18.96 FRT : 22.27
PEG Ratio MGA : 4.66 FRT : 1.35
PS Ratio MGA : 0.37 FRT : 7.15
PB Ratio MGA : 1.26 FRT : 2.81
Total Revenue (TTM) MGA : $42.18B FRT : $1.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) MGA : $5.58B FRT : $860.70M
EBITDA (TTM) MGA : $3.83B FRT : $970.04M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGA achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MGA has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 6.12%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.20% annualized return.

MGA

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -11.48%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 6M: 19.88%
• 1Y: 71.22%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: -5.68%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

FRT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: -0.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MGA vs. FRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGA

MGA Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MGA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MGA Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FRT

FRT Risk / Return Rank: 63
FRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FRT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FRT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGA vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magna International Inc. (MGA) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGA	FRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	0.63	+1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	1.04	+2.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.13	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	0.94	+2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	3.71	+7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGA vs. FRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGA and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGA	FRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	0.63	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.19	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	-0.01	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.40	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MGA and FRT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MGA vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

MGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FRT's 4.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGA Magna International Inc.	3.49%	3.64%	4.55%	3.11%	4.23%	2.13%	2.26%	2.66%	2.18%	1.94%	2.30%	1.90%
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust	4.20%	4.39%	2.93%	4.21%	4.26%	3.12%	4.96%	3.22%	3.42%	2.98%	2.70%	2.48%

Drawdowns

MGA vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGA drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGA and FRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGA	FRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.01%	-57.42%	-21.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.47%	-15.66%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.02%	-34.99%	-31.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.02%	-56.47%	-9.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.84%	-10.18%	-25.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.37%	-11.81%	-9.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	3.95%	+2.48%

Volatility

MGA vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

Magna International Inc. (MGA) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.37%. This indicates that MGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGA	FRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.06%	5.37%	+4.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.42%	11.89%	+15.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.40%	21.90%	+13.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.35%	23.45%	+11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.23%	29.41%	+5.82%

Financials

MGA vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Magna International Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MGA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 11.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.2%.

FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 225.48M and revenue of 336.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.1%.

MGA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported an operating income of 749.34M and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 180.65M and revenue of 336.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.

MGA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a net income of -1.02M and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 129.74M and revenue of 336.05M, resulting in a net margin of 38.6%.