PortfoliosLab logo
FRT vs. VTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FRT and VTR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FRT vs. VTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRT:

-0.22

VTR:

1.92

Sortino Ratio

FRT:

-0.18

VTR:

2.62

Omega Ratio

FRT:

0.98

VTR:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

FRT:

-0.17

VTR:

1.91

Martin Ratio

FRT:

-0.62

VTR:

8.69

Ulcer Index

FRT:

8.78%

VTR:

5.11%

Daily Std Dev

FRT:

22.55%

VTR:

22.61%

Max Drawdown

FRT:

-57.42%

VTR:

-83.38%

Current Drawdown

FRT:

-23.58%

VTR:

-6.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRT:

$8.17B

VTR:

$30.07B

EPS

FRT:

$3.42

VTR:

$0.33

PE Ratio

FRT:

27.67

VTR:

201.88

PEG Ratio

FRT:

3.77

VTR:

1.82

PS Ratio

FRT:

6.78

VTR:

5.94

PB Ratio

FRT:

2.75

VTR:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRT:

$911.13M

VTR:

$5.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRT:

$530.00M

VTR:

$1.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRT:

$631.36M

VTR:

$1.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 12.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed VTR with an annualized return of 0.10%, while VTR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.69% annualized return.


FRT

YTD

-14.69%

1M

3.45%

6M

-16.48%

1Y

-4.95%

5Y*

8.16%

10Y*

0.10%

VTR

YTD

12.86%

1M

0.63%

6M

2.81%

1Y

43.11%

5Y*

21.41%

10Y*

5.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. VTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTR is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTR is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTR is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTR is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTR is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTR is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRT vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the VTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and VTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FRT vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than VTR's 2.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.70%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.77%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%5.04%4.14%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and VTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FRT vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

FRT vs. VTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
311.44M
1.36B
(FRT) Total Revenue
(VTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRT vs. VTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Ventas, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
67.3%
42.2%
(FRT) Gross Margin
(VTR) Gross Margin
FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 209.50M and revenue of 311.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.37M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 109.32M and revenue of 311.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.1%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 197.69M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 65.54M and revenue of 311.44M, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 46.87M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.