PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRT vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRT vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 1.39%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.44% annualized return.


FRT

1D
1.61%
1M
3.28%
YTD
25.42%
6M
25.01%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
1.39%

VNQ

1D
1.31%
1M
1.13%
YTD
11.77%
6M
12.16%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRT vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
25.42%-5.91%12.07%6.55%-22.66%65.97%-30.66%12.51%-8.10%-3.59%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.77%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FRT and VNQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.83

The correlation between FRT and VNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRT vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRT
FRT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRT vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRTVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

1.40

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

4.37

+8.13

FRT vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRT vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRTVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-73.07%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-8.34%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-17.46%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.99%

-34.48%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.47%

-42.40%

-14.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.66%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-13.60%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.66%

+0.09%

Volatility

FRT vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 4.96% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRTVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

5.19%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

10.20%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

13.84%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

18.86%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.47%

20.75%

+8.72%

Dividends

FRT vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than VNQ's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.63%4.39%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.56%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRT and VNQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQ has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to FRT (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRT dropped -57.42% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRT and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer