PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRT vs. VNQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FRT and VNQ is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FRT vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.01%
1.75%
FRT
VNQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRT:

0.53

VNQ:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

FRT:

0.83

VNQ:

0.91

Omega Ratio

FRT:

1.10

VNQ:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

FRT:

0.39

VNQ:

0.38

Martin Ratio

FRT:

2.71

VNQ:

2.31

Ulcer Index

FRT:

3.52%

VNQ:

4.27%

Daily Std Dev

FRT:

17.97%

VNQ:

16.19%

Max Drawdown

FRT:

-57.42%

VNQ:

-73.07%

Current Drawdown

FRT:

-14.83%

VNQ:

-12.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 0.38%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.43% annualized return.


FRT

YTD

-4.93%

1M

-4.90%

6M

-3.01%

1Y

9.12%

5Y*

-0.08%

10Y*

0.38%

VNQ

YTD

0.64%

1M

1.44%

6M

2.80%

1Y

10.44%

5Y*

2.71%

10Y*

4.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. VNQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VNQ is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VNQ is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VNQ is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VNQ is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VNQ is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VNQ is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRT vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRT, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.530.61
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRT, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.830.91
The chart of Omega ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.101.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRT, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.390.38
The chart of Martin ratio for FRT, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.712.31
FRT
VNQ

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and VNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.53
0.61
FRT
VNQ

Dividends

FRT vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VNQ's 3.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.16%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.83%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%3.60%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and VNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.83%
-12.99%
FRT
VNQ

Volatility

FRT vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 7.03% and 6.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.03%
6.76%
FRT
VNQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab