PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRT vs. BEN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FRTBEN
YTD Return14.19%-23.99%
1Y Return25.54%-5.42%
3Y Return (Ann)0.37%-11.67%
5Y Return (Ann)1.29%-0.44%
10Y Return (Ann)2.17%-5.15%
Sharpe Ratio1.640.02
Sortino Ratio2.370.24
Omega Ratio1.291.03
Calmar Ratio1.030.01
Martin Ratio8.910.03
Ulcer Index3.42%19.72%
Daily Std Dev18.62%30.49%
Max Drawdown-57.42%-72.80%
Current Drawdown-8.72%-43.47%

Fundamentals


FRTBEN
Market Cap$9.73B$11.24B
EPS$3.43$0.85
PE Ratio33.1325.26
PEG Ratio4.120.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.18B$8.44B
Gross Profit (TTM)$712.23M$5.62B
EBITDA (TTM)$753.93M$1.15B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FRT and BEN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FRT vs. BEN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than BEN's -23.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has outperformed BEN with an annualized return of 2.17%, while BEN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.56%
-8.32%
FRT
BEN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. BEN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRT, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRT, currently valued at 8.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.91
BEN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BEN, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BEN, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BEN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BEN, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BEN, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.03

FRT vs. BEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the BEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and BEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.64
0.02
FRT
BEN

Dividends

FRT vs. BEN - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than BEN's 5.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.83%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%2.98%
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
5.76%3.02%4.44%3.37%4.36%4.04%13.32%1.92%1.87%1.71%1.82%0.72%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. BEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum BEN drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and BEN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.72%
-43.47%
FRT
BEN

Volatility

FRT vs. BEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is 5.01%, while Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that FRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.01%
7.80%
FRT
BEN

Financials

FRT vs. BEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Franklin Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items