PortfoliosLab logo
FRT vs. BEN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FRT and BEN is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FRT vs. BEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRT:

0.02

BEN:

-0.04

Sortino Ratio

FRT:

0.14

BEN:

0.14

Omega Ratio

FRT:

1.02

BEN:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

FRT:

-0.01

BEN:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

FRT:

-0.04

BEN:

-0.19

Ulcer Index

FRT:

9.05%

BEN:

13.25%

Daily Std Dev

FRT:

23.27%

BEN:

34.34%

Max Drawdown

FRT:

-57.42%

BEN:

-72.80%

Current Drawdown

FRT:

-19.94%

BEN:

-39.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRT:

$8.40B

BEN:

$11.66B

EPS

FRT:

$3.48

BEN:

$0.69

PE Ratio

FRT:

27.79

BEN:

32.14

PEG Ratio

FRT:

3.54

BEN:

0.51

PS Ratio

FRT:

6.87

BEN:

1.34

PB Ratio

FRT:

2.71

BEN:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRT:

$1.22B

BEN:

$8.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRT:

$734.78M

BEN:

$5.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRT:

$824.68M

BEN:

$1.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than BEN's 12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has outperformed BEN with an annualized return of 0.31%, while BEN has yielded a comparatively lower -3.77% annualized return.


FRT

YTD

-10.63%

1M

6.39%

6M

-11.88%

1Y

0.48%

5Y*

10.97%

10Y*

0.31%

BEN

YTD

12.16%

1M

27.52%

6M

6.67%

1Y

-1.52%

5Y*

9.86%

10Y*

-3.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. BEN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BEN is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BEN is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BEN is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BEN is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BEN is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BEN is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRT vs. BEN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the BEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and BEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FRT vs. BEN - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than BEN's 5.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.48%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
5.63%7.69%3.02%4.44%3.37%4.36%4.04%13.32%1.92%1.87%1.71%1.82%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. BEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum BEN drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and BEN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FRT vs. BEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is 7.53%, while Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that FRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FRT vs. BEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Franklin Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
309.15M
2.11B
(FRT) Total Revenue
(BEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRT vs. BEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Franklin Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
66.2%
47.8%
(FRT) Gross Margin
(BEN) Gross Margin
FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.78M and revenue of 309.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

BEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 108.13M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

BEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.60M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 63.77M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.

BEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 151.40M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.