PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGA vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGA vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Magna International Inc. (MGA) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGA achieves a 29.87% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MGA has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 8.67%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


MGA

1D
0.06%
1M
15.36%
YTD
29.87%
6M
39.84%
1Y
94.42%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
-4.62%
10Y*
8.67%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGA vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGA
Magna International Inc.
29.87%33.72%-26.29%8.76%-28.04%16.57%33.41%24.30%-18.40%33.69%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MGA and IVV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.56

The correlation between MGA and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGA vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGA
MGA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGA vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magna International Inc. (MGA) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGAIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.39

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

3.25

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

3.17

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.19

14.71

-2.52

MGA vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGA and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGAIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.39

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.83

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.86

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

MGA vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGA drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGA and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGAIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.01%

-55.25%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-8.89%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.57%

-18.75%

-29.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-24.53%

-41.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

-33.90%

-32.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.04%

-0.76%

-20.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-10.78%

-10.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

1.91%

+5.87%

Volatility

MGA vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Magna International Inc. (MGA) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that MGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGAIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

2.87%

+7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.09%

8.90%

+19.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.18%

11.80%

+23.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.64%

16.88%

+18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

18.05%

+17.40%

Dividends

MGA vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

MGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
MGA
Magna International Inc.
2.88%3.64%4.55%3.11%4.23%2.13%2.26%2.66%2.18%1.94%2.30%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGA and IVV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGA has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGA dropped -79.01% vs IVV's -55.25%.

MGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGA and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer