MFWIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFWIX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWIX has underperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return.
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFWIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFWIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
MFWIX
CSUAX
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFWIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.17 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.36 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 10.32 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFWIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.61 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFWIX and CSUAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
MFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFWIX drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFWIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.01% | -52.20% | +19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -7.98% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.22% | -20.45% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | -35.05% | +11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.50% | -4.38% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -8.49% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.83% | -0.09% |
Volatility
MFWIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) is 3.04%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that MFWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFWIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 3.26% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 6.89% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.85% | 11.48% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 12.89% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 14.89% | -5.29% |