MFVL vs. CMCI

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while CMCI is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index. MFVL is actively managed, while CMCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMCI.

Performance

MFVL vs. CMCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than CMCI's 17.94% return.

MFVL

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.89%
• 6M: -0.41%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMCI

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 15.79%
• YTD: 17.94%
• 1Y: 22.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. CMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	1.60%	1.22%
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	17.94%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and CMCI is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

MFVL vs. CMCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CMCI

CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 66
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFVL vs. CMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFVL	CMCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.64	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.00	—

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. CMCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum CMCI drawdown of -11.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and CMCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFVL	CMCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-11.54%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-7.11%	+4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-3.68%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFVL	CMCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	12.36%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.64%	12.64%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.64%	12.64%	0.00%

MFVL vs. CMCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFVL vs. CMCI - Dividend Comparison

MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	8.38%	9.89%	3.93%	1.64%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFVL and CMCI in my portfolio?

MFVL and CMCI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFVL or CMCI?

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFVL or CMCI?

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFVL or CMCI?

CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between MFVL and CMCI?

MFVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CMCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.65% for CMCI.