CMCI vs. ZSB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB).
CMCI and ZSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMCI is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index. It was launched on Aug 21, 2023. ZSB is a passively managed fund by USCF that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023. Both CMCI and ZSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CMCI vs. ZSB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMCI vs. ZSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 16.28% | 7.90% | 5.68% | -2.87% |
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 5.29% | 64.34% | -19.70% | -16.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZSB's 5.29% return.
CMCI
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSB
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 52.55%
- 3Y*
- 0.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMCI vs. ZSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSB's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMCI vs. ZSB — Risk / Return Rank
CMCI
ZSB
CMCI vs. ZSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMCI | ZSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.97 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.43 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.09 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 8.08 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMCI | ZSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.97 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -0.07 | +0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCI and ZSB is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CMCI vs. ZSB - Dividend Comparison
CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than ZSB's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 8.50% | 9.89% | 3.93% | 1.64% |
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 0.87% | 0.92% | 2.96% | 3.59% |
Drawdowns
CMCI vs. ZSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum ZSB drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and ZSB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCI | ZSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -49.26% | +37.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -16.75% | +9.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -11.23% | +10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -32.26% | +28.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 6.41% | -3.60% |
Volatility
CMCI vs. ZSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 4.79%, while USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMCI | ZSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 11.89% | -7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 22.62% | -12.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 26.76% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 19.77% | -7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 19.77% | -7.16% |