PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCI vs. ZSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMCI vs. ZSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMCI vs. ZSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
16.28%7.90%5.68%-2.87%
ZSB
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund
5.29%64.34%-19.70%-16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZSB's 5.29% return.


CMCI

1D
0.25%
1M
6.95%
YTD
16.28%
6M
19.48%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZSB

1D
-1.81%
1M
1.20%
YTD
5.29%
6M
33.68%
1Y
52.55%
3Y*
0.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMCI vs. ZSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSB's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMCI vs. ZSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI
CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSB
ZSB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. ZSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCIZSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.97

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.43

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.09

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

8.08

-1.15

CMCI vs. ZSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ZSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and ZSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCIZSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.97

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

-0.07

+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and ZSB is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CMCI vs. ZSB - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than ZSB's 0.87% yield.


TTM202520242023
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
8.50%9.89%3.93%1.64%
ZSB
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund
0.87%0.92%2.96%3.59%

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. ZSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum ZSB drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and ZSB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCIZSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-49.26%

+37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-16.75%

+9.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-11.23%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-32.26%

+28.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

6.41%

-3.60%

Volatility

CMCI vs. ZSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 4.79%, while USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMCIZSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

11.89%

-7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

22.62%

-12.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

26.76%

-13.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

19.77%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

19.77%

-7.16%