PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUS vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 4.92% return.


MFUS

1D
0.79%
1M
2.00%
6M
14.80%
YTD
17.18%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.00%
1M
1.25%
6M
4.00%
YTD
4.92%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
17.18%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
4.92%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and UUP is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFUSUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.28

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

6.25

+9.05

MFUS vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-22.19%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-3.65%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-10.05%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-10.37%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.75%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-8.88%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.32%

+0.27%

Volatility

MFUS vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.42%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUSUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

1.42%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

4.33%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

6.01%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

7.22%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

6.90%

+10.42%

MFUS vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUS vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than UUP's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.37%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.27%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUS and UUP have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to UUP (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.99% vs 5.84% for UUP. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.37% for MFUS.

MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UUP is Currency. MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.75% for UUP.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUS and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer