MFUS vs. QARP
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 13.30%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
MFUS vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 15.92% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.14% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and QARP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between MFUS and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
QARP
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
QARP
Healthcare
MFUS
QARP
Industrials
MFUS
QARP
Financial Services
MFUS
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
QARP
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
QARP
Energy
MFUS
QARP
Communication Services
MFUS
QARP
Basic Materials
MFUS
QARP
Real Estate
MFUS
QARP
Utilities
MFUS
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
QARP
MFUS vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.46 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.88 | 15.38 | -0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -35.44% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -7.26% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -15.65% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -22.75% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | 0.00% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -4.39% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.63% | -0.01% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 2.76% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 8.22% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26% | 10.58% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 15.54% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 19.55% | -2.24% |
MFUS vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and QARP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.30% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer