PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUS vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.


MFUS

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.47%
6M
11.55%
YTD
15.92%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
15.92%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.14%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and QARP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.88

The correlation between MFUS and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFUS
QARP

Technology

24.7%
23.5%

Healthcare

13.4%
13.9%

Industrials

12.2%
8.5%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
9.6%

Energy

6.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

5.1%
11.3%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Utilities

1.6%
2.0%

Technology

MFUS
24.7%
QARP
23.5%

Healthcare

MFUS
13.4%
QARP
13.9%

Industrials

MFUS
12.2%
QARP
8.5%

Financial Services

MFUS
12.0%
QARP
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MFUS
10.5%
QARP
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

MFUS
9.7%
QARP
9.6%

Energy

MFUS
6.4%
QARP
5.8%

Communication Services

MFUS
5.1%
QARP
11.3%

Basic Materials

MFUS
2.8%
QARP
2.3%

Real Estate

MFUS
1.7%
QARP
1.0%

Utilities

MFUS
1.6%
QARP
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFUSQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.46

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

15.38

-0.51

MFUS vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-35.44%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-7.26%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-15.65%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-22.75%

+4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

0.00%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-4.39%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.63%

-0.01%

Volatility

MFUS vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUSQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.76%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

8.22%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

10.58%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

15.54%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

19.55%

-2.24%

MFUS vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUS vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.38%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUS and QARP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.30% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUS and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer