PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFUS vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFUS vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's -0.61% return.


MFUS

1D
0.72%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
3.90%
6M
5.07%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
0.98%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFUS vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFUSPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.77

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

2.47

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.91

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.15

7.76

+0.39

MFUS vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFUSPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.77

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

2.01

-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and PYLD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MFUS vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than PYLD's 6.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.52%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.37%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-4.52%

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-3.25%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-1.98%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-0.64%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

0.80%

+1.53%

Volatility

MFUS vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.66%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFUSPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

1.66%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

2.13%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

3.44%

+12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

4.00%

+11.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

4.00%

+13.45%