MFUS vs. MINT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT).
MFUS and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFUS is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.
Performance
MFUS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFUS vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 3.90% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 0.96% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 0.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 0.96% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFUS vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
MINT
MFUS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 12.69 | -11.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 24.85 | -23.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 9.78 | -8.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 28.78 | -27.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 237.55 | -229.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 12.69 | -11.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 5.76 | -4.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 2.42 | -1.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and MINT is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFUS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than MINT's 4.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.52% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.44% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and MINT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -4.62% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -0.16% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -2.42% | -15.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | 0.00% | -3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -0.17% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 0.02% | +2.31% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 0.09% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 0.17% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 0.36% | +15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 0.58% | +14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 0.95% | +16.50% |